IPO Valuation

Endurance Advisory insight cover: IPO Valuation

Part three of a three-part series on going public, covering the pros and cons of an IPO, the IPO process, and IPO valuation.

Executive summary

IPO valuation is an art obscured by spreadsheets showing hundreds of statistics. In due course price, perhaps the most important number, finally gets full attention. Companies go through the entire IPO process without knowing the price. Understanding what investors and investment bankers evaluate in determining it is the best way to set expectations.

An IPO is more often priced attractively for a bank than for a mortgage company, more often for a large cap than a small cap, and more often for a tightly controlled company than a flexible one.

Determining the offering price

The first step is identifying key valuation drivers. At the most basic level, price is the product of earnings and the price-earnings multiple. The trick is estimating the multiple. Key drivers include both operating statistics and financial ratios.

Operating statistics include production volume, margins by product, data about the servicing book, prospective growth whether organic or by acquisition, and the risks and opportunities in the business.

Financial ratios include book equity, both tangible and gross, and other balance sheet measures; net income, cash flow, and other income statement measures; and holding company capital structure, meaning enterprise value versus market value.

The art of valuation is all about projecting future performance. Careful evaluation of historical operating statistics and financial statements gives insight into competitive position, suppliers and customers, other industry participants, and the impact of economic conditions. This improves the accuracy of projections and helps the investment bank identify the appropriate peer group.

Comparables

Investment banks primarily use prices achieved by comparable companies when setting an IPO price.

Trading comparables are current stock prices of similar companies multiplied by fully diluted shares outstanding, after adjusting for options. This is the market value of common equity, the market cap. Adding debt, often net of cash, yields enterprise value.

M&A comparables are the market cap or enterprise value of companies, divisions, or assets recently sold in a publicly announced transaction. Calculation is similar to trading comps except that pricing is static as of the announcement date rather than varying day by day.

Once peers and peer transactions are identified, a wide variety of operating statistics and ratios can be compared. The price-earnings ratio usually takes the lead, not just for the last twelve months but for the current year and next year. The second most common multiple is market to book, which is price divided by book value per share.

Although an IPO is priced on current market conditions, it is common to look at multiples as trends over time to gain an appreciation for stability or volatility. Trend analysis is often most valuable across broad indices over a business cycle, since multiples for individual companies gyrate with company-specific news.

It is critical to evaluate similarities and differences in the multiples calculated for each peer. Some high-price companies trade at high multiples across the board. High-margin companies tend to trade at low price-earnings multiples, since earnings per share is high, but high market-to-book multiples. Low-margin companies may show the reverse. For every multiple, the analyst's job is to understand why it sits where it does.

The IPO discount

IPO pricing is typically at a discount to trading multiples. Offerings are often used to reward an investment bank's best customers, and the reward comes in the form of that discount. An IPO is usually priced 10 to 15 percent below expected fully distributed valuation to incentivize investors to buy. As a result IPOs typically trade up from the offering price, which ensures positive market perception. When an IPO falls in the after-market it generates bad publicity. The size of the discount depends on sector and company risk, expected volatility, and expected trading liquidity.

Pricing day

On the offer date the price is determined by the strength of the order book. Despite the apparent rigor of projections and multiple calculations, the critical question is whether prospective investors believe it, and belief shows up in actual buy orders. If the book is not strong enough, the deal will be repriced, priced at the low end of the range, or pulled.

Timing requires strong and stable fundamentals as well as a strong general market. The company needs solid fundamentals across the next several projection periods in order to report good quarterly earnings in the first few quarters after listing. Since the process itself takes four to six months, that means a year or more of stability: no negative news, no earnings surprises, no exceptions. General market conditions must also support the deal. Given those hurdles, it is fairly common for offerings to be postponed or scrapped entirely.

Considering how much art goes into the price, think about it as a range. Sensitivity analysis shows what price is achieved at various multiples and financial ratios, and is necessary to understand the complexities of market discovery and pricing.

Summary

Endurance Advisory works as an independent advisor alongside companies on IPO planning and valuation analysis: assisting with corporate strategy, risk management planning, and investor messaging; providing analytical support to test and validate underwriter recommendations; and modeling and right-sizing an offering and prospective follow-ons to align with a multi-year strategic plan and capital needs.

More insights

M&A & Corporate Finance
White Paper

IPO Process

Part two of three. Four to six months from drafting to pricing day, plus when a direct listing or SPAC beats a traditional offering. Updated for the 2025 market.

M&A & Corporate Finance
Article

What Is Driving Bank M&A

Deal volume recovered from the 2023 trough to 130 deals in 2024 and a 140 to 160 pace in 2025. What is driving it: mark-to-market pressure, geographic scale, technology investment, and CEO succession.

Risk & Compliance
White Paper

Managing Commercial Real Estate Concentrations in a Challenging Economic Environment

The FDIC advisory on commercial real estate concentrations, replacing the 2008 guidance. Capital, allowance levels, and credit risk-management practices, plus the liquidity risks that compound them.

Risk & Compliance
White Paper

Ten Key Regulatory Challenges for Banks

Regulatory intensity is driven less by new rules than by the volume of issuances, the breadth of supervision, and their reach across the bank. An introduction to KPMG’s Ten Key Regulatory Challenges of 2024.

Strategy & Liquidity
White Paper

High Return Opportunities

How banks can pursue higher yield without taking on more risk, and the situations where that trade-off is real.

M&A & Corporate Finance
White Paper

IPO Valuation

Part three of three. How bankers actually set the number: trading and transaction comparables, the 10 to 15 percent IPO discount, and why the order book decides it.

Strategy & Liquidity
White Paper

Syndicated Loan Market Opportunities

Where community and regional banks can still find quality commercial loans in a crowded syndicated market.

Strategy & Liquidity
White Paper

Liquidity Strategies for a Tough Environment

The current economic environment doesn’t offer any “good” investments. The COVID recession is different from anything we have experienced. This makes it difficult for banks to manage their investment portfolios without taking on undue interest rate risk.

Digital & AI
White Paper

Emerging Digital Payments Companies Cannot Overlook Sanctions Protocols

Amid the heavy growth of start-ups in the digital payments and currency space, OFAC’s (U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control) announced settlement agreement with BitGo, Inc., sends a clear message: a lack of sanctions compliance can be costly.

Digital & AI
White Paper

Embrace New Processes to Ensure Technology Implementations are Successful

Most transformation projects fail entirely, or at least fail to deliver promised results. Many small financial institutions use technology to transform business operations in the pursuit of efficiencies and other competitive gains within their industries. Many of these efforts fail to achieve their strategic objectives. These well-intentioned efforts often suffer significant cost overruns and scheduling delays which erode the initial value proposition. The traditional response is to drive more rigorous management routines and delay or cancel the project. In many cases, management fails to understand the underlying issue impacting performance.

Digital & AI
White Paper

Be a Top Relationship Bank for Your Clients: Evaluate Your Payments Platform to Grow and Retain Commercial Clients

2021 is the year to create a strategy to grow your commercial banking relationships by leveraging your bank’s payments platform. Listen to your commercial clients. They will speak to their needs related to accepting credit and debit cards, invoicing their vendors, and detailed transaction reporting on deposits and payments. This article suggests five ways to improve your payment product offerings to meet your clients’ needs and grow commercial relationships.

M&A & Corporate Finance
In the Media

Should Your Firm Join The Mortgage IPO Boom? Consider These Facts First

Stephen Curry provides insights around the mortgage IPO boom in his byline for National Mortgage News.